Compare /
Cody by Sourcegraph vs Cursor
Our Verdict
Based on ratings, features, pricing, and capabilities, Cursor edges ahead in this comparison. Cursor offers better value and broader platform support.
Feature
Cody by Sourcegraph
Cursor
Rating
⭐ 4.7/5
⭐ 4.9/5
Free Plan
Starting Price
$9/mo
$20/mo
Monthly Visits
6.8M
24.0M
API Support
Open Source
AI Capabilities
Mobile App
Desktop App
Browser Extension
Integrations
5 apps
4 apps
Team Size
SMB
ENTERPRISE
Cody by Sourcegraph Pros & Cons
Pros
- Superior context retrieval for massive multi-million line codebases
- Lets you switch between Claude 3.5, GPT-4o, and Gemini on the fly
- Open-source codebase for community transparency
Cons
- Requires Sourcegraph indexing setup for full multi-repo power
- Autocomplete latency can be slightly slower than Cursor
Cursor Pros & Cons
Pros
- Reliable infrastructure
- Fast intuitive user interface
- Broad ecosystem integration
Cons
- Full feature set requires paid plan
Cody by Sourcegraph Key Features
- Multi-Repository Context Search
- Choice of Frontier LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini)
- Open Source Extension
- Custom Code Prompts & Recipes
Cursor Key Features
- Cloud Sync
- Multi-platform Access
- Collaboration Tools
- Export & Integrations
- Security & Encryption